Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 00:24
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
The Best Lunch to Eat if You Have High Cholesterol, Recommended by a Dietitian - EatingWell
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What’s next?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Boy, 8, dies hours after complaining of headache when infection spread to brain - The US Sun
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Thank you.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What was the craziest place that you had sex with someone in public?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Fantasy Baseball SP Roundup 6/12: Nobody Beats Jay Mis - Pitcher List
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.